Obama, Dems struggle for deal on health care
Published: Saturday, January 16, 2010 at 6:01 a.m.
Last Modified: Saturday, January 16, 2010 at 1:53 a.m.
WASHINGTON— President Barack Obama and top congressional Democrats reached for agreement Friday on cost and coverage disputes at the heart of sweeping health care legislation, their marathon White House bargaining sessions given fresh urgency by an unpredictable Massachusetts Senate race.
One key obstacle appeared on its way to a resolution when Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., requested the elimination of an intensely controversial, one-of-a-kind federal subsidy to cover the entire cost of a Medicaid expansion in his home state.
That provision in the Senate-passed measure has drawn criticism from governors and others in both political parties from the moment it was disclosed. In its place, officials said Obama and lawmakers decided to increase federal money for Medicaid in all 50 states, although it was not clear if there would be enough to cover the expansion completely.
The increase in the Medicaid program is a key element in the bill's overall goal of expanding health coverage to millions who lack it. The bill also envisions creation of new insurance exchanges, essentially federally regulated marketplaces where consumers can shop for coverage. Individuals and families at lower incomes would receive federal subsidies to defray the cost.
The overhaul legislation also is designed to curb insurance industry practices such as denial of coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.
At the White House, spokesman Robert Gibbs was unequivocal that Obama's yearlong campaign for health care legislation would prove successful. "As you heard the president say yesterday, we're going to get health care done," he said.
Not everyone was quite so certain, particularly given poll results from Massachusetts that showed Republican Scott Brown within reach of a possible upset over Democrat Martha Coakley in a three-way race to succeed the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.
"If Scott Brown wins, it'll kill the health bill," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass, reflecting that the Republican would provide opponents a decisive 41st vote to uphold a filibuster and block passage. Frank predicted Coakley would ultimately win the seat and thus preserve the 60-vote Senate majority essential to pass the legislation, and Obama hurriedly scheduled a weekend campaign trip to the state.
Even so, Frank's remark sent shudders through the ranks of Democrats, who Obama acknowledged on Thursday have had to take a series of tough votes on the health care measure.
The president called on Congress in his Inaugural Address a year ago to send him legislation that would remake the health care system, including expansion of coverage, new regulations on industry and unprecedented measures to slow the rise in health care costs generally.
Neither the House- nor the Senate-passed legislation accomplishes that last goal, according to officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, a federal agency, and it appeared the White House might be trying to redefine its terms.
In a statement concerning an agreement with labor leaders on a tax on high-cost insurance plans, the White House said Thursday that dental and vision "benefits are outside the core health spending which this provision is aimed at slowing." Obama has pushed forcefully to include the tax as one way to restrain the growth of health care costs generally.
The president has made an unusual commitment in time and energy to the negotiations at the White House. He stayed in the Cabinet Room with leading lawmakers until 1 a.m. on Friday, and congressional aides said he was essentially serving as a referee on key issues that the House and Senate leaders could not resolve.
Beyond that, he was willing to reopen issues where the two bills were identical. One example involved the patent protection that drug makers would receive for their biotech drugs from generic competitors. The president wants to give generic firms quicker entry into the marketplace, and the pharmaceutical industry's top lobbyist, former Rep. W.J. Tauzin, sent an e-mail threatening to oppose the legislation if that happened.
The talks at the White House proceeded in private — a distinct contrast, Republicans pointed out, to Obama's 2008 campaign pledge to have final negotiations televised on C-SPAN.
Officials familiar with the discussions said that Wednesday's talks had ranged over the types and extent of benefits and subsidies to include in the bill. When the Congressional Budget Office reported back with cost estimates, negotiators discovered the legislation they were working on would not raise enough funds to cover everything, they added.
The principal source of funding for the legislation is to be a series of cuts in projected federal payments to Medicare providers such as hospitals, nursing homes and others. Insurance companies that sell private Medicare coverage would take the brunt of the impact.
Additionally, union leaders signed off Thursday on a tax on high-cost insurance plans, and a Senate-passed increase in the payroll tax of incomes over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples was likely to be expanded. At the same time, a House-passed income tax surcharge appeared dead.
Even with an agreement on cost and coverage issues, Obama and congressional Democrats would have to resolve controversy over abortion, coverage of immigrants and other issues before sealing a final compromise.
Comments are currently unavailable on this article