Iraq invasion logic lacking

<p>In the 1980s the argument for the build-up of nuclear warheads went that these weapons of mass destruction would serve as a deterrent and would never actually be used except in the case of an enemy invasion. This had a certain twisted logic; twisted since it was based on fear.</p><p>The Bush administration's justification for the invasion of Iraq lacks any logic whatsoever, and even runs counter to the twisted logic of the 1980s.</p><p>If the U.S. government honestly believed that Iraq under Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction it would never have dared to invade since this power-hungry madman would certainly have used them. This should prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that the war is a sham.</p><p></p><h3>Paul Wojtalewicz,</h3> <p>Gainesville</p>