Denying Wal-Mart the right decision by City Commission


Published: Thursday, July 1, 2004 at 6:01 a.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, July 1, 2004 at 1:19 a.m.

Regarding The Sun's June 26 editorial "Take three": It was discouraging to read that Wednesday's City Commission decision "was not a vote against having a Wal-Mart super-center in Gainesville."

The Sun's retrograde position that spreading dozens of acres of asphalt and concrete for "one or more supercenters" simply because "the company has determined that there is a market here for such operations" is further cause for dismay. Isn't this a choice that should be made locally?

Wal-Mart routinely makes headlines due to its sub-standard labor and purchasing practices and the negative effects it has had on local businesses throughout the U.S. The fact that Wal-Mart was lobbying to build near the headwaters of Hogtown Creek speaks volumes of its disregard for local socio-environmental values.

The commission's willingness to defend local interests should be lauded rather than dismissed as "anti-business." No doubt local and regional business people would strongly welcome support on a level to which Wal-Mart has become accustomed.

Rather than roll out the red carpet for a "hassle-free and expeditious" deal, a City Commission that is genuinely concerned about the quality of life in our community would strongly consider whether the creation of more low-income jobs by a well-known labor abuser and local business destroyer is truly in the best interest of city residents.

Mary Witoshynsky,

Gainesville

Reader comments posted to this article may be published in our print edition. All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged.

Comments are currently unavailable on this article

▲ Return to Top