'Branding' a way of verifying
Published: Saturday, March 1, 2003 at 6:01 a.m.
Last Modified: Friday, February 28, 2003 at 10:32 p.m.
If The Gainesville Sun is going to cover the absurd lawsuit brought in Lexington, Ky., (Feb. 21) because a uterus had been marked with initials before removal, they at least owe it to their readers to explain that the so-called "branding" was, in fact, a highly desirable surgical practice.
Just as the wrong organ occasionally gets transplanted into a person, containers used to send removed body parts from the operating room to the pathology laboratory occasionally get mislabelled.
Marking such a specimen by a surgeon, in some way, to verify which surgeon removed it is simply an additional line of defense in trying to prevent errors.
When dissecting the organ, the pathologist might find a malignancy in a uterus: all women should be grateful for any additional things the surgeon might do to help assure the source of the organ is correctly identified.
Reader comments posted to this article may be published in our print edition. All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged.
Comments are currently unavailable on this article